USPTO serial 75560060
BRANIFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRANIFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5J-257, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5J-257, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELIZABETH MILLER ROESEL
MICHAEL S LOW AIRNOMICS INC140 YORKVILLE AVE TORONTO, ON M5R 1C2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transportation of Persons, Property and Mail by Air | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |