USPTO serial 75560203
PEOPLE ARCHITECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEOPLE ARCHITECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Provo
DONALD W NILES PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN4800 IDS CTR80 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business planning, namely, human resources planning and strategy development, and consulting services rendered in conjunction therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Custom training programs in the field of leadership development, interpersonal skills and strategic planning, and consulting services rendered in conjunction therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |