USPTO serial 75560318
DUNDEE MUTUAL FUNDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUNDEE MUTUAL FUNDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M. HYMAN
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Management of mutual funds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |