USPTO serial 75560319
POWER AMERICAN FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER AMERICAN FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dundee Investment Management & Research Ltd.
Toronto Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dundee Investment Management & Research Ltd.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M. HYMAN
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGEMENT OF MUTUAL FUNDS WHICH INVEST IN THE ASSETS OF AMERICAN COMPANIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dundee Investment Management & Research Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named POWER AMERICAN FUND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |