USPTO serial 75560321
POWER BALANCED FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER BALANCED FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dundee Investment Management & Research Ltd.
Toronto Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Dundee Investment Management & Research Ltd.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M HYMAN
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGEMENT OF MUTUAL FUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dundee Investment Management & Research Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named POWER BALANCED FUND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |