Drawing for SHRED 'N' VAC PLUS

USPTO serial 75560379

SHRED 'N' VAC PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2386958Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 19, 2000
Examiner
OTTE, SARAH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHRED 'N' VAC PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol H. Morita

GEORGE H KOBAYASHI MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MITCHELL, LTDSTE 2500203 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601-1262

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007GASOLINE-POWERED LAWN IMPLEMENTS; NAMELY HAND-HELD LEAF BLOWERS AND VACUUMEXPIREDJun 13, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2011CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 28, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 28, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 7, 2005E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 27, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Jan 28, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance