USPTO serial 75560495
WORLDSPORT.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORLDSPORT.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirt S. O'Neill
DIANE MELNICK FROSS, ZELNICK, LEHRMAN & ZISSU866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | sporting services, namely, arranging and conducting athletic competitions and recreational events; publishing services, namely, publication of books and periodicals in the field of sports and recreation; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of other on CD-ROMS featuring information on sports and recreation; educational services, namely, conducting classes, workshops, seminars and conferences featuring instruction on sports, recreation and sports health; organization of athletic competitions and games and recreational events; on-line services, namely, providing information about sports and recreation via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing online calendars, newsletters and periodicals in the fields of sports and recreation via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Laureus World Sports Awards Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Worldsport Networks Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WORLDSPORT.COM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |