USPTO serial 75560717
FLEXRITE FOILS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 23, 2000
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLEXRITE FOILS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chicago Heights, IL
Chicago Heights, IL
Chicago Heights, IL
Glenview, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eligio C. Pimentel
Eligio C. Pimentel McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.500 W Madison St34th FlChicago, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | heat transfer surface coatings in the nature of multi-layered flexible foils or membranes to protect and decorate a wide variety of consumer and industrial products such as interior and exterior building materials, furniture, cabinetry and appliances | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CFC International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CFC International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CFC International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named FLEXRITE FOILS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 23, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 28, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |