USPTO serial 75560757
ACCESSAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCESSAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent A. Herink
DANIEL ROSENBERG DAVIS, BROWN, KOEHN, SHORS & ROBERTS666 WALNUT ST STE 2500DES MOINES, IA 50309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Air transportation for passengers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |