Drawing for SICPADAT

USPTO serial 75560852

SICPADAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SICPADAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEVIN G. SMITH

KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002printing inks, security printing inks, copying inks, printing ink pastes; paints of any kind for graphic printing; coatings in the nature of lacquers; varnishes; visible and invisible security markers of taggants, namely covert taggant coatings or inksACTIVE—
009electronic or electrically operated devices for producing, reading and/or recording coatings and markings or taggants, namely electronic or electronically operated printers and readers for coatings, markings or taggants; devices, namely, optical scanners, for sensing surfaces and for visualizing or for reading markings with a frequency out of the visible spectrum; devices, namely, magnetic scanners, for recording electromagnetically or magnetically detectable markingsACTIVE—
016printing products, namely, paper, cardboard, and products made or such material, namely, banknotes, tickets, labels, banderoles, stationary and fiscal documents in the nature of forms, stickers, labels, banderoles, stamps and seals; materials for packaging, namely, paper envelopes, plastic or paper bags, envelopes or pouches for merchandise packaging, plastic bubble packs for wrapping or packagingACTIVE—
035computerized tracking of parcels and other goods, namely, branded products, security documents, and pharmaceuticalsACTIVE—
042consulting services in the field of product security, authentication and detection of product piracy; tracking services for retrieval or encoded or marked products; electronically reading, processing, storing, transmitting and providing security or authenticity related data; licensing or intellectual property rightsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance