USPTO serial 75560900
DYNELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
65926 FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE
65926 FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth C. Kotenberg
MARGARET H BITLER (MAIL STOP: BW-D-335) ROUTE #202-206 NOAVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCRTH PO BOX 6800BRIDGEWATER, NJ 08807-0800Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY HORMONAL PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |