USPTO serial 75561034
QR CODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2001
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with QR CODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KARIYA-CITY, AICHI-PREF., JP
KARIYA-CITY, AICHI-PREF., JP
Chita-gun, Aichi-pref, JP
Chita-gun, Aichi-pref, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside PlazaSuite 1500Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TWO DIMENSIONAL DATA CODE READERS; BAR CODE READERS; TWO DIMENSIONAL DATACODE SCANNERS; BAR CODE SCANNERS; ELECTRONIC DATABASE FEATURING TWO DIMENSIONAL CODES RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA AND CAPABLE OF BEING READ BY TWO DIMENSIONAL CODE READERS AND SCANNERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR TWO DIMENSIONAL CODE DRAWING, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR BAR CODE DRAWING, COMPUTER PROGRAM RECORDED ON COMPACT DISKS FOR TWO DIMENSIONAL CODE DRAWING; AND COMPUTER PROGRAM RECORDED ON MEMORY CARDS FOR TWO DIMENSIONAL CODE DRAWING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DENSO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DENSO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DENSO WAVE INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by DENSO WAVE INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named QR CODE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 29, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 26, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 10, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |