USPTO serial 75561378
TALBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2001
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TALBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eunice P. de Carvalho and Felicia J. Boyd, Laura G. Coates, Jodi A. DeSchane, John M. Haurykiewicz, Calvin L. Litsey, Michelle A. Paninopoulos, Patricia I. Reding, Karl G. Schwappach, James R. Steffen, Gary S. Weinstein, Natalie Hanlon-Leh, Christopher P.
EUNICE P DE CARVALHO FAEGRE & BENSON LLP2200 WELLS FARGO CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | *office* furniture | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |