USPTO serial 75561516
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD R. MICHAUD
RICHARD R MICHAUD CITYPLACE IIMCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLP185 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103-4102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines and installations comprised thereof for processing liquids, solids and gases for general industrial use, namely centrifuges, cyclones, dewatering machines, extraction towers, flocculators, flotation machines, hydrocyclones, liquid separating machines, mixers, centrifugal pumps and diaphragm pumps, all pumps being for general industrial use including mixing, reacting, homogenizing, dispersing, disintegrating and macerating, repulpers, screening machines, sieve bends, settlers, slakers, mechanized mixing tanks, thickeners, and wash machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | water, wastewater and sewage treatment systems and installations comprising aerators, biological treatment apparatus, clarifiers, decanters, classifiers, diffusers, rotary vacuum drum filtering machines, disc filtering machines, pressure belt drum filtering machines, horiziontal belt filtering machines, rigid belt filtering machines and pressure filtering machines, digesters, distributors, filters, fluid bed furnaces for combusting, drying and incinerating, pumps, screens, settlers, sludge mixers and tanks, all sold as components of the aforesaid systems and installations; fluid bed furnaces for calcining, roasting, drying, cooling and incinerating for general industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |