Drawing for GATEWAY OBJECT SERVER

USPTO serial 75561720

GATEWAY OBJECT SERVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GATEWAY OBJECT SERVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B. EISEN

MARK B EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIO LLP3202-20 QUEEN ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3R3CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Software for providing remote access to an image databaseACTIVEApr 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 21, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 3, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 3, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance