Drawing for SERENITY

USPTO serial 75561754

SERENITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2477004Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2001
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SERENITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauri S. Thompson

Lauri S. Thompson GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP3773 Howard Hughes ParkwaySuite 500 NorthLas Vegas, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL APPEARANCES BY A MOVIE STAR, ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF DANCE PERFORMANCES, ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ADULT SEX-ORIENTED SHOWS DISTRIBUTED OVER TELEVISION, SATELLITE, AND OTHER VIDEO MEDIA, ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ADULT SEX-ORIENTED ENTERTAINMENT AND SEX-ORIENTED GRAPHICS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2012CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 27, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 20, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 14, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Dec 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance