USPTO serial 75561819
MICHELINA'S PIZZA SINGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2625428Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2002
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICHELINA'S PIZZA SINGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DULUTH, MN
DULUTH, MN
Duluth, MN
Duluth, MN
Duluth, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew G. Wedmore
ANDREW G WEDMORE PAULUCCI INTERNATIONAL LTD INC201 W FIRST STSANFORD, FL 32771UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | frozen, microwavable, individual serving-sized pizzas with a variety of toppings, namely, tomato sauce, cheese, spices, meats, and vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 19, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BELLISIO FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICHELINA'S, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Luigino's, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Luigino's, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Luigino's, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MICHELINA'S PIZZA SINGLES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |