USPTO serial 75562214
DIAMOND DERMABRASION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2000
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIAMOND DERMABRASION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Diamond Dermabrasion Sr Pty Ltd
Adelaide, South Australia 5000, AU
Diamond Dermabrasion Sr Pty Ltd
Adelaide, South Australia 5000, AU
Diamond Dermabrasion Sr Pty Ltd
Adelaide, South Australia 5000, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VANGELIS ECONOMOU
TERRENCE J MCALLISTER OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLE LLPONE LANDMARK SQUARE10TH FLSTAMFORD, CT 06901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments, namely, pneumatically powered air sources directing an air stream having entrained therein non-diamond abrasive particulates for removal of layers of skin; dermabrasion apparatus and instruments, namely, pneumatically powered air sources directing an air stream having entrained therein non-diamond abrasive particulates for removal of layers of skin; apparatus for cosmetic treatment of the skin, namely, pneumatically powered air sources directing an air stream having entrained therein non-diamond abrasive particulates for removal of layers of skin parts and accessories therefor | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Dermabrasion Sr Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Dermabrasion Sr Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond Dermabrasion Sr Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named DIAMOND DERMABRASION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |