USPTO serial 75562415
AIR PASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIR PASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Incline Village, NV
Incline Village, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY B SCOTT
MARY B SCOTT GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Telephone calling cards, not magnetically encoded | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |