USPTO serial 75562425
SABRINA FABULOUS GRILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, TAMI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SABRINA FABULOUS GRILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine Haight Farley
CHRISTINE HAIGHT FARLEY RABINOWITZ, BOUDIN, STANDARD, KRINSKY &LIEBERMAN, PC740 BROADWAY FIFTH FLNEW YORK, NY 10003-9518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Food Venture Capital Group, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Food Venture Capital Group, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SABRINA FABULOUS GRILL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |