USPTO serial 75562634
OUTWARDLY ANGLED TRACTION TEETH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OUTWARDLY ANGLED TRACTION TEETH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jim Zegeer
801 N PITT ST STE 108ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Spikeless golf cleets for attachment to sports shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |