USPTO serial 75562955
SMART VENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALVES, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART VENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Stephenson
JAMES E STEPHENSON HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | rapid deflation device, namely a manually operated valve specially fitted for use with hot air balloons | ABANDONED | Nov 30, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |