Drawing for H EL CANAL DE HISTORIA

USPTO serial 75563012

H EL CANAL DE HISTORIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITCHIE, BRANDEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H EL CANAL DE HISTORIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICESACTIVE—
041EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, TELEVISION PROGRAMMING FEATURING HISTORY, HISTORICAL SUBJECTS AND INDIVIDUALS, HISTORICAL SETTINGS AND HISTORICAL DRAMASACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 17, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 18, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 4, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance