USPTO serial 75563571
AEGIS VORTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AEGIS VORTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY A. STEIN
BARRY A STEIN C/O CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COH12TH FL SEVEN PENN CTR1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL REVASCULARIZATION SYSTEMS, COMPRISED OF ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING - AN ATHERECTOMY CATHETER, A BALLOON GUIDE WIRE, AND A CATHETER DRIVE AND DEBRIS EVACUATION SYSTEM, AND ACCESSORIES FOR SUCH SYSTEMS, NAMELY, AN ADVANCER CRADLE FOR THE ATHERECTOMY CATHETER, AN INFUSATE TUBING ASSEMBLY, AN EXTRACTION TUBING ASSEMBLY, A PRESSURE TRANSDUCER, AN INSUFFLATOR AND ASSOCIATED TUBING, A BALLOON INFLATION APPARATUS, ADVANCER CRADLE O-RINGS, A HEMOSTASIS VALVE, AND AN ADVANCER CRADLE MANIFOLD, AND OTHER TUBING AND CATHETERS, FOR USE BY INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGISTS AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGISTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |