Drawing for ELIZABETH POST

USPTO serial 75563636

ELIZABETH POST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELIZABETH POST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harriet E. Perkins

HARRIET E PERKINSSTE 1800TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003BODY SPRAYS, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALMACTIVE—
004CANDLESACTIVE—
021NYLON MESH BODY CLEANSING POUFS; BATH SPONGES; BRUSHES, NAMELY, NAIL BRUSHES, BRUSHES FOR WASHING THE BODY; BRUSHES FOR WASHING THE BACKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 6, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 31, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance