USPTO serial 75563692
EXCALIBUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXCALIBUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alchova 10, CZ
Alchova 10, CZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W. BROOKE
THOMAS W BROOKE PENNSYLVANIAHOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | SPORTS DRINKS AND ISOTONIC DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |