Drawing for EDUBYTE

USPTO serial 75563899

EDUBYTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDUBYTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel

SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COURSEWARE FOR THE CREATION AND MANAGEMENT OF PRESENTATION MODULES FOR USE IN PRESENTATION AND DELIVERING CONTENT FOR EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES IN BOTH ACADEMIC AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS BY MEANS OF A DIGITAL TEXTBOOK OR OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNITACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing on-line professional and executive training and development in the fields of organizational design, management practices, and business modelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 26, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance