Drawing for RX ESSENTIAL

USPTO serial 75564066

RX ESSENTIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2531103Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2002
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RX ESSENTIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARBARA J. QUINN

RX ESSENTIAL INC.435 NORTH ROXBURY DRIVESUITE 311BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Food supplements for humans; namely, dietary food supplements, herbal supplements, nutritional supplements, vitamin and mineral supplements, natural food supplementsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2007C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jul 10, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 29, 2007CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 13, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 15, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 22, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 30, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 22, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 2, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance