Drawing for FIRE SHIELD 300

USPTO serial 75564191

FIRE SHIELD 300

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRE SHIELD 300?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John F. A. Earley

JOHN F A EARLEY 86 THE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE E1288 VALLEY FORGE RDP O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006ductile iron threaded pipe fittings, namely, elbows, tees, caps, reducers, unions, plugs, crosses, and other fittings that may complement the line; and manually operated, metal valves, namely, butterfly valves with grooved ends, and wafer valves for use with flangesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 18, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 9, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2002REINREINSTATED—
May 22, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 14, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 10, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance