USPTO serial 75564313
MATERIALMANAGER A MASTERPLANT SOLUTION BY FLUOR DANIEL RIGHT MATERIAL, RIGHT PLACE, RIGHT TIME.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2499319Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2001
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MATERIALMANAGER A MASTERPLANT SOLUTION BY FLUOR DANIEL RIGHT MATERIAL, RIGHT PLACE, RIGHT TIME.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irving, TX
Irvine, CA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. Fish & Mei Tsang
MEI TSANG2603 MAIN STIRVINE, CA 92614-6232IRVING, CA 92614-6232Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction management, construction of commercial buildings and chemical processing plants; and construction services, namely construction equipment leasing | EXPIRED | Jun 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Fluor Daniel, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named MATERIALMANAGER A MASTERPLANT SOLUTION BY FLUOR DANIEL RIGHT MATERIAL, RIGHT PLACE, RIGHT TIME.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |