USPTO serial 75564354
SIGHTSOUND.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIGHTSOUND.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ansel M. Schwartz
ANSEL M SCHWARTZ ATTORNEY AT LAWONE STERLING PLZ201 N CRAIG ST STE 304PITTSBURGH, PA 15213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission of data via computer terminals | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |