USPTO serial 75564419
THE PLANT ACTIVATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE PLANT ACTIVATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
4002 Basel, CH
4002 Basel, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A. FRIEDMAN
JAMES A ZELLINGER SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC410 SWING RDGREENSBORO, NC 27409UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely, for use in manufacturing mordants for seeds, defoliants, wound pastes for trees and plants, plant growth regulators, preparations for the treatment of seeds, preparations for the protection of seeds and plants against plant pathogens, and plant protection agents of a prophylactic nature; plant protection agents, namely, organic compounds that act in a prophylactic manner by increasing plant resistance naturally or by biogenetic alteration; plant growth regulators for commercial, agricultural and domestic use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Preparations for destroying vermin, fungicides, herbicides, nematocides, and agents for use as a biocide for the protection of seeds and crops against plant pathogens, all for commercial, agricultural and domestic use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |