USPTO serial 75564484
MATRIXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2740885Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2003
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MATRIXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GLENVIEW, IL
FRANKLIN, MA
FRANKLIN, MA
FRANKLIN, MA
Haverhill, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn A. Sullivan
Lynn A. Sullivan Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.Two Prudential Plaza, 180 N. Stetson AveSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC ASSEMBLY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY SOLDER BALL DISPENSING AND PLACEMENT APPARATUS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPEEDLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPEEDLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPEEDLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Camelot Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MATRIXX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |