USPTO serial 75564973
RDMAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RDMAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL
G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL HOGAN & HERTSON LLP555 13TH ST NW STE 700 WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OPTIMIZING RESULTS IN THE AREAS OF PRODUCT DEMAND, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING, PURCHASING, TRANSPORTATION, LOGISTICS, AND STATISTICAL AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS IN THE FIELD OF MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION, TRANSPORTATION AND RETAILING COMPANIES, AND PRINTED USER MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION, NAMELY, CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE AREAS OF PRODUCT DEMAND, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING, PURCHASING, TRANSPORTATION, LOGISTICS, AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF LOGISTICS, FORECASTING, MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION, TRANSPORTATION AND RETAILING | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL ANALYSIS CONSULTATION FOR OPTIMIZATION OF LOGISTICS, FORECASTING, MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION, TRANSPORTATION AND RETAILING | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES; NAMELY, CONDUCTING TRAINING COURSES IN THE USE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN THE AREAS OF PRODUCT DEMAND, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING, PURCHASING, TRANSPORTATION, LOGISTICS, AND STATISTICAL AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR OPTIMIZING RESULTS IN CONNECTION WITH MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION, TRANSPORTATION, AND RETAILING COMPANIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Manugistics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Manugistics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named RDMAP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |