USPTO serial 75565099
PARTNERCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARTNERCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
69120 Heidelberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ilene B. Tannen, Esq
ILENE B TANNEN ESQ PENNIE EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2720UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical products for industrial purposes; chemical products for genetic, biological and biochemical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | pharmaceutical and veterinary products; chemical agents for medical purposes; dietetic food for medical use; baby food for weaning; medical plasters; wound covering materials for surgical purposes; dental amalgam; dental impression materials; all purpose disinfectants; disinfectants for medical instruments; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides for domestic and agricultural use; herbicides for domestic and agricultural use | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 009 | optical apparatus and instruments for medical, physical, chemical and biological purposes; measuring apparatus and instruments for medical, physical, chemical and biological purposes; signaling apparatus and instruments for medical, physical, chemical and biological purposes; apparatus and instruments for medical, physical, chemical and biological research; video frequency apparatus; blank magnetic data carriers; magnetic media carrying computer programs for data processing computers; database processing software for medical, chemical, physical, and biological purposes; spreadsheet software for medicinal, chemical, physical, and biological purposes; computers | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | performing chemical and biological research for others; performing scientific research for others; data processing computer software design for others; preparing and delivering opinions on the basis of chemical, biochemical and medicinal data; preparing and delivering opinions for medicinal and genetic examinations of biological organisms; preparing and delivering opinions for diagnostic procedures; and preparing and delivering opinions for forensic procedures | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |