USPTO serial 75565121
PERVIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERVIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-9344 Weitensfeld 183, AT
A-9344 Weitensfeld 183, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl Hormann
KARL HORMANN LAW OFFICE OF KARL HORMANN86 SPARKS STCAMBRIDGE, MA 02138-2216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Homeopathic Pharmaceuticals for use in the enhancement of physical wellbeing and of the immune system; pharmaceutical preparations for use in the enhancement of wellbeing and of the immune system; dietary food supplements, food supplements, nutritional supplements, herbal teas for medicinal purposes, vitamin and mineral supplements, and herbal supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, herbal tea for food use, cocoa, herbal food extracts used as flavorings, non-meat foods for human consumption, malt extracts for food, cereal-based snack-food, and herbal tea food beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richard Bittner Ges.m.b.H.
- Other trademarks owned by Richard Bittner Ges.m.b.H.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PERVIVO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |