USPTO serial 75565398
SAVIN NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAVIN NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Einhorn
DAVID A EINHORN ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, PC1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020-1182UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING PARTS AND SUPPLIES ORDERS VIA A REAL-TIME ON-LINE SYSTEM, NAMELY, SOFTWARE GENERATING A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE THAT IS DOWNLOAD BY CUSTOMERS FOR USE IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE VENDOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE ORDERING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OFFICE MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |