USPTO serial 75565599
1.800.TICKETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 1.800.TICKETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marina Del Rey, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE D KAHN
MICHELLE D KAHN SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER ET ALFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR 17TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO TRAVEL VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 041 | ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO SHOWS AND OTHER ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 042 | ONLINE TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TEMPORARY LODGING VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |