USPTO serial 75565660
SPADE & ARCHER PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSAYA, LISA W.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPADE & ARCHER PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin Komen
EDWIN KOMEN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded audiocassettes and compact discs all featuring music and pre-recorded video tapes, digital video discs and laser discs featuring live action and animated motion pictures and music videos | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of television programs and motion pictures featuring live-action, animation and music videos, production of sound recordings for others and music publishing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anderson's Illusions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SPADE & ARCHER PRODUCTIONS
- Other trademarks owned by SPADE & ARCHER PRODUCTIONS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SPADE & ARCHER PRODUCTIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |