USPTO serial 75565672
INTERACTIVE NEGOTIATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERACTIVE NEGOTIATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Gibby
JOHN A GIBBY THE BILTMORERED HOT LAW GROUP OF ASHLEY LLC817 W PEACHTREE ST STE 400ATLANTA, GA 30308-1138Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and documentation, namely, a selling system which allows a company 's inside and outside sales representatives, distributors, and other sales channels to perform tasks related to selling to customers, and which allows the company's customers to perform such tasks for themselves, both either within the company 'facilities, from a remote location, or via global interactive computer networks; said tasks include analysis of customer requirements; product, project and pricing configuration, optimization of sales quotes based on product option criteria, pricing margins and commissions, and product/component availability, and, access to product and service catalogs and other multimedia information sources (Scientific and Electrical Apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |