USPTO serial 75565705
PRODUCT LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRODUCT LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL E LUTZKER
JOEL E LUTZKER ESQ SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | integrated product design, product development, product research, product marketing and sourcing of products, primarily in the field of apparel and computer services, namely, providing an interactive data base in the field of integrated product design, product development, product research, product marketing and sourcing of products, primarily in the field of apparel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2002 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |