USPTO serial 75566013
SUPERIOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 2003
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPERIOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
OWINGS MILLS, MD
OWINGS MILLS, MD
OWINGS MILLS, MD
SOLO CUP OPERATING CORPORATION
HIGHLAND PARK, IL
Oshkosh, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey S. Sokol
LINDA A KUCZMA C/O WALLENSTEIN WAGNER & ROCKEY LTD311 S WACKER DR FL 53CHICAGO, IL 60606-6604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | PAPER PLATES and PAPER CUPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SWEETHEART CUP COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SWEETHEART CUP COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SWEETHEART CUP COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOLO CUP OPERATING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Fonda Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SUPERIOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |