USPTO serial 75566053
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dinesh Agarwal
DINESH AGARWAL LAW OFFICE OF DINESH AGARWAL5350 SHAWNEE RD STE 330ALEXANDRIA, VA 22312UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | industrial and hydraulic hose accessories, namely, metal fittings for industrial and hydraulic hoses, metal ferrules for industrial and hydraulic hoses, metal hose assemblies consisting of metal hoses with metal fittings, metal couplings for use with industrial and hydraulic hoses, manually operated metal valves for industrial and hydraulic hoses, metal clamps for industrial and hydraulic hoses, metal strainers for use with industrial and hydraulic hoses, metal adapters for industrial and hydraulic hoses, metal quick couplings for use with industrial and hydraulic hoses, metal swivel joints for industrial and hydraulic hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | rubber and plastic industrial hoses for use in the construction, residential, marine, recreational, transportation, agricultural, fishing, forestry, mining, petroleum, food and beverage, chemical, fire and medical industries; rubber and plastic hydraulic hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | distributorship services featuring industrial and hydraulic hoses; operation of retail and wholesale outlets featuring industrial and hydraulic hoses and related accessories | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 26, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |