USPTO serial 75566071
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D - 59202 Oelde, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
URSULA B DAY
Ursula B Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | EQUIPMENT FOR BARN AND PASTURE, NAMELY AUTOMATED INSTALLATION FOR CONVEYING CONCENTRATED FEED IN TROUGHS AND PARTS THEREOF, AUTOMATED INSTALLATION FOR THE SUPPLY OF LIQUID IN RECEPTACLES, AUTOMATED CONVEYERS FOR MANURE REMOVAL; MILKING MACHINES AND MILKING SYSTEMS COMPRISING MILKING MACHINES AND PARTS THEREOF | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | INSTALLATIONS FOR THE CONTROL, REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OF MILKING CATTLE, FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF ANIMALS, FOR THE DISTRIBUTION AND RATIONING OF FEED, FOR MAINTAINING THE CATTLE CALENDER, FOR REGISTERING AND MEASURING MILK VOLUME, FOR MILK QUALITY CONTROL, FOR THE MEASURING AND REGISTERING OF MILK TEMPERATURE, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM COMPRISING COMPUTERS, MULTI-MEDIA TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, MULTI-MEDIA RESPONDERS, MULTI-FUNCTIONAL ELECTRONIC NECKLACES FOR ANIMALS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |