USPTO serial 75566327
THERE IS A BIT OF NEW YORK IN EVERY DROP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THERE IS A BIT OF NEW YORK IN EVERY DROP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT
PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT MASON MASON & ALBRIGHTP O BOX 2246ARLINGTON, VA 22202-0246UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes, colognes and other beauty products, namely, body lotions, body creams, body powders, body gels, body moisturizes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |