USPTO serial 75566340
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hawkesbury, Province of Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARSHA G. GENTNER
MARSHA G GENTNER JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLC400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | BABIES'; INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S BEDROOM ACCESSORIES, NAMELY LAMPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | BABIES', INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, PAPER AND PLASTIC PLACE MATS; CHILDREN'S BOOKS; BOOKENDS; PAPER MACHE FIGURINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | BABIES', INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S BAGS, NAMELY, DIAPER BAGS AND TOTE TRAVEL BAGS FOR BABY BOTTLES AND BEVERAGES; SOFT BABY CARRIERS WORN ON THE BODY | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | BABIES', INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, PICTURE FRAMES; FIGURINES MADE OF PLASTIC; PILLOWS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BABIES', INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S BEDROOM ACCESSORIES, AND BEDDING, NAMELY, WINDOW CURTAINS, WINDOW FABRIC VALANCES, BED SHEETS, BED BLANKETS, PILLOW CASES, PILLOW SHAMS, QUILTS, BED AND CRADLE CANOPIES, DUST RUFFLES, CRIB SHEETS, COMFORTERS, BUMPER PADS FOR INSIDE CRIBS, BED SKIRTS, DIAPER STACKERS; BABIES' AND INFANTS' LAYETTE, NAMELY, FACE CLOTHS, RECEIVING BLANKETS, TOWELS; AND TEXTILE PLACE MATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | LAYETTES; BABIES' AND INFANTS' CHRISTENING GOWNS, SHAWLS, AND WRAPS; INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, UNDERWEAR, SHIRTS, PANTS, T-SHIRTS, CREEPERS, SUITS, SUNSUITS, SLEEPERS, PAJAMAS, SWEATERS, SNOWSUITS, JACKETS, RAINWEAR SUITS, ONE PIECE SUITS, OVERALLS, JEANS, JUMPERS, SKORTS AND SHORTS; BABIES', INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S SWIMWEAR, NAMELY, BATHING SUITS AND BEACH ROBES; BABIES', INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S BOOTS AND SHOES; BABIES', INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S BONNETS, HATS, CAPS, TOQUES, SCARVES, MITTENS, SOCKS, BOOTIES AND PULL ON SLIPPERS; CLOTH BABY DIAPERS; AND CLOTH BIBS | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | BABIES', INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S BEDROOM ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, WALL PAPER AND WALL PAPER BORDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | BABIES', INFANTS' AND CHILDREN'S TOYS, NAMELY, PLAYGROUND AND RUBBER ACTION BALLS; TOY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION BLOCKS, STUFFED ANIMALS, BATH TIME TOYS; MUSICAL TOYS, PLUSH TOYS, AND PLUSH DOLLS; MOBILES FOR INFANTS AND CHILDREN; MUSICAL MOBILES FOR INFANTS AND CHILDREN; CRIB MOBILES; TOY MOBILES; PLUSH MOBILES FOR INFANTS AND CHILDREN | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |