USPTO serial 75566395
SILVAGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILVAGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA C. CHILDS
LISA C CHILDS MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLC401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Miniplugs for transplanting into larger nursery containers, or into nursery beds | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | plant biotechnology, namely, the developments of techniques for the application of biological processes of the production of plants; somatic embryogenesis, namely, a vegetative propagation technology used in the production of plant embryos, artificial seeds, miniplugs, seedlings and in the establishment and testing of plant clonal banks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |