USPTO serial 75566613
SMILE USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMILE USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Elizabeth, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
PLZ 9900 RTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |