USPTO serial 75566627
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irwin C. Alter
IRWIN C ALTER ALTER AND WEISSSTE 165019 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIP FOR SUEDE-LIKE SYNTHETIC FABRIC IN THE PIECE USED FOR APPAREL, UPHOLSTERY AND SEATING MATERIAL ON OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL FURNITURE; INSERTS AND COVERS ON WOOD FURNITURE, COVERINGS FOR WALLS, CEILINGS AND PANELS; AND FOOTWEAR, BAGS, PORTFOLIOS AND OTHER PERSONAL ACCESSORIES AND OTHER SPECIAL END USERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |