USPTO serial 75566792
GRAND DIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAND DIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Bloomfield, MI
West Bloomfield, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soap, shampoo, hair rinse, perfume oils, body oil mist, body gel, fragrant water mist, gentle exfoliates; nail polish; lipstick, lip balm, lip gloss, mascara, lip liner pencil, eye liner pencil, eye shadow, eye liner liquid, body souffle lotion, gentle face; cleansers, masks, astringent | ACTIVE | Jun 4, 1992 |
| 025 | Elegant and casual wear-- namely dresses, skirts, jackets, tops, blouses, hats, caps, shorts, pants, halter tops, T-shirts, shirts, handwear-namely gloves, lingerie-- teddys, tap pants, pajamas, bustier, panties, bras, swimwear-bikinis, suits, hand painted sneakers | ACTIVE | Dec 6, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |